For months now our newsdesk has followed the tracks of a mysterious whale from 2010, a miner who not only mined thousands of bitcoin back in the day, but has also spent over 8,000 bitcoin during the past ten months. This week, the Russian blockchain researcher, Issak Shvarts published a report about the decade-old block rewards, and he claims to have shown â€œfull proofâ€ that the bitcoins are now owned by Coinbase and also distributed after the transfers.
The Case of the Mysterious 2010 Block Reward Spends
For a while now our newsdesk at news.Bitcoin.com has been monitoring a strange bitcoin (BTC) whale that has been spending coins mined in 2010. The bitcoins were mined a decade ago and they had never been moved since the day the block rewards were discovered. However, throughout 2020 and into 2021, news.Bitcoin.com has tracked a total of 7,000 BTC that mysteriously moved after ten years. Our team has worked with researchers at Btcparser.com and weâ€™ve also discussed the topic with the Russian blockchain researcher and the author of the Telegram channel â€œgfoundinshit,â€ Issak Shvarts.
Shvarts has also leveraged the parser Btcparser.com and the blockchain explorer oxt.me. The researcher believes he has provided 100% proof that the old school bitcoins are now owned by Coinbase, and even dispersed to the San Francisco exchangeâ€™s customers. Shvarts has also tracked an aggregate total of 8,000 BTC, which is worth over $250 million using todayâ€™s exchange rates.
â€œI have previously suggested that these bitcoins belong to Coinbase,â€ Shvarts details in his latest report. â€œNow, I am sure of that,â€ he added.
His research study suggests that thereâ€™s a consolidation of 20 wallets, 50 BTC each for one address. Then the 1,000 BTC wallet is scattered in batches of 10 BTC per address, Shvarts refers to them as â€œâ€˜pocketsâ€™ for withdrawal.â€ Some of the BTC sent to the pockets were withdrawn in â€œlarge amountsâ€ Shvarts insists â€œapparently for some VIP users,â€ he added.
Shvarts compared the addresses from a withdrawal made from Coinbase to one of the 10 BTC addresses that derived from the original 1,000 BTC address. The clusterization mechanism clearly shows â€œthese wallets belong to the Coinbase exchange,â€ Shvarts notes.
The researcher adds:
Whitening the Gray Ecosystem
After explaining that there could be many possible theories involved with this entity, Shvarts asks the question: â€œHow many more [whale miners from the early days] are waiting in the wings?â€ Shvarts also details that these coins are â€˜virgin bitcoinsâ€™ which are â€œcrystal clear in terms of AML.â€
â€œOddly enough, Coinbase simply â€˜injectsâ€™ them into the market, using them for retail withdrawals,â€ Shvartsâ€™s study emphasizes. â€œBy doing this, it â€˜whitensâ€™ the whole gray Bitcoin ecosystem a little. Whether this is some kind of cunning plan or is it just so that the exchange is not reproached for using â€œgrayâ€ coins â€“ I do not know,â€ Shvarts adds.
The only proven fact Shvarts said is that these coins have been discovered, and started moving during 2020 and into early 2021 to addresses owned by Coinbase. Then the 1,000 bitcoin batches are simply sent to the â€œexchange withdrawal system.â€ The onchain researcher believes that â€œanother whale from 2010â€ is also moving coins, but is slightly smaller than the 8,000 coin mega-whale.
â€œFor some reason, [the smaller whale] moves his coins with a slight time delay from the movement of the coins described in this report,â€ Shvarts concludes.
What do you think about the report that claims 8,000 bitcoin from 2010 was sent to Coinbase and later sold on the open market? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.